Most of our readers—red-pilled as they are—have heard by now of Bill Gates’ statement last week in which he backpedals on his decades-long position that “climate change” is an existential threat to humanity. The red-pilled among us knew it all along.
For those who have not heard, here is an excerpt from an article in the Epoch Times last week, dated 10-28-25. It is entitled “Prediction of Climate Catastrophe Loses Some of Its Strongest Advocates.” QUOTE:
Tech billionaire Bill Gates’s recent blog post stating that the “doomsday view” of environmental and social catastrophe from global warming is wrong appears to mark a significant shift in the debate over climate change.
While reiterating the orthodoxy that climate change will have “serious consequences” and will hurt poor people the most, Gates goes on to say that “it will not lead to humanity’s demise.”
“People will be able to live and thrive in most places on Earth for the foreseeable future,” he said.
Written as a message to attendees of the U.N. Climate Change Conference in Brazil, which begins on Nov. 10, Gates’s op-ed states that the biggest problems the world faces are poverty and disease, not rising temperatures. END QUOTE. Source
On the very same day another journalist for the Epoch Times reported that Bill “Dr. Strangelove” Gates (my moniker) is now calling for vastly more sums to be spent on poverty and disease. Why? Because the U.S. under Trump no longer stands for Uncle Sucker. The money to enslave and kill us is drying up. Here’s a few excerpts from that article, entitled: “Bill Gates Calls on UN to Pivot Funding From Climate to Health Care.” All emphases mine. QUOTE:
Bill Gates has called on the United Nations to make a “major strategic pivot” from what he termed its “doomsday view” of climate goals toward alleviating poverty and funding vaccines. …
In a 17-page post released on his 70th birthday, the billionaire Microsoft co-founder said his shift is a pragmatic stance following cuts to foreign aid made by wealthier countries, led by the United States, which he said is impacting vaccine funding.
The Gates Foundation is a major donor to global health institutions, including the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization and numerous research programs.
Some vaccine programs funded by the Gates Foundation in the developing world have come under criticism for issues of consent and transparency and for causing serious side effects, including deaths. In 2017, the Indian government cut some funding ties with the Gates Foundation on immunization programs, citing conflicts of interest.
More widely, the safety and efficacy of vaccination are being questioned in the wake of the COVID-19 jabs, which Gates was heavily involved in promoting. U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert Kennedy Jr., a longtime critic of the Microsoft billionaire, recently announced a comprehensive review into the safety of childhood immunizations. Source.
But this pivot from the bogeyman “climate change” to “poverty and disease” is just another sham and scam to provide cover for his real goal which Gates has also publicly stated, but which, of course, the “fake news” have not exposed to widespread public knowledge.
That goal is drastic population reduction. But the Babylonian Medianites’ complicity in covering for Gates is now for nought as citizen-journalists are now exposing the lies of the elitists and cabalistas.
Therefore we see citizen-journalist, Dr. Robert Malone, now taking Gates to task for his funding of various supranational “global governance” organizations such as the UN and its offshoots, as shown in the Substack post by Malone on October 30, 2025. QUOTE:
Bill Gates, Polio and the WHO
by Dr. Robert W. Malone
Skewing of global health priorities by a rich man seeking absolution and immortality
The British Medical Journal, otherwise known as BMJ, just published a peer-reviewed study titled “Who’s leading WHO? A quantitative analysis of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation’s grants to WHO, 2000-2024.”
Note that the authors have no affiliation to BMJ, the WHO, or Bill Gates, but are academics centered in the UK.
The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF) ranks as the World Health Organization’s (WHO) second-largest funder, providing 9.5% of WHO’s income from 2010 to 2023. This study examines how BMGF funds allocated to the WHO are spent.
Out of all the contributions from BMGF to WHO, a significant $4.5 billion, which is 82.6%, was dedicated to infectious diseases. Of this, $3.2 billion (58.9%) specifically went toward polio, even though polio accounts for only a tiny part of the overall global disease burden.
Polio is an “interesting” target for a massive vaccine campaign because it is generally not spread through the respiratory tract, but instead is spread through the fecal-oral route.
The virus is shed in the stool of an infected person (even if they have no symptoms). It can contaminate drinking water, food prepared with unwashed hands as well as surfaces and objects (especially in areas with poor sanitation).
Although the Ro (baseline reproduction coefficient) for polio virus is typically listed in the 5-7 range (high), that is a historical number from when sanitation practices were much different and does not reflect the realities of polio in westernized nations today. In other words, it is outdated.
The decline of polio in Western countries is closely linked not only to vaccination efforts but also to significant advances in public sanitation, water infrastructure, and hygiene habits that started many years prior and progressed alongside the introduction of vaccines.
So, if the WHO and BMGF really wanted to eradicate polio, they would spend more resources building sanitation infrastructure, including clean drinking water supplies, and better septic systems. This would also dovetail nicely into the WHO’s primary mission of improving global health.
Only a small fraction of the BMGF funding to the WHO truly contributed to strengthening healthcare worldwide, combating non-communicable diseases, and tackling broader health issues. These areas are essential to the WHO’s mission and to global health.
It's worth considering the motives behind the global push to vaccinate against polio, especially since the actual Ro is low in Westernized countries. In countries with poor sanitation, improving sanitation may have a greater impact on reducing polio cases than simply aiming to vaccinate everyone.
Sometimes, addressing the root causes can be just as important as the vaccines themselves. The historic major successes in public health do not involve vaccines; they involve sanitation.
The vast majority of outbreaks are now vaccine-derived polio. Let that sink in for a moment…
Furthermore, in 2024, 289 confirmed cases of polio caused paralysis worldwide (paralytic polio is what is reported to the WHO). This suggests that the actual number of polio infections could range from 30,000 to 300,000 (at the upper limit), as the vast majority of cases remain undetected.
About 95% of polio is asymptomatic, and only 0.1–1 % is paralytic (clinical poliomyelitis). The truth is that polio is not the “killer” disease that the propagandists make it out to be.
In reality, there are somewhere between 3.75 polio infections per million people to 37.5 polio infections per million people. The vast majority of these are asymptomatic.
Going a step further with these calculations, there is 1 case per 27.7 million people worldwide of paralytic polio.
The Gates Foundation’s official Annual Report 2024, which lists “Polio — $889,000,000” under Total direct grantee support (Global Development).” This reflects grants made to partners (e.g., WHO/UNICEF/GPEI implementers) and excludes operating costs and program-related investments.
Bill Gates and his foundation invested $889 million in polio eradication efforts in 2024 alone. This means that for each of the 289 cases of paralytic polio, he spent approximately $3 million per person—the vast majority of that going into the arms of children.
How could this be a good investment, given the state of global health and the fact that proper sanitation and clean water not only “cures” polio but also improve almost all aspects of global health?
During an October 2025 Q&A with Rotary International, Gates emphasized his unwavering dedication to eliminating polio. He shared, “It is critical that we finish the job on polio. Eradication is the only way to make sure that continuing challenges don’t mean an ongoing risk for children today and for generations to come.”
Thinking it through does not take a genius intellect. This is an impossible goal. The reason why is embedded in the text above. THE VAST MAJORITY OF POLIO CASES ARE NOW VACCINE DERIVED! That means that the live-attenuated vaccine is infecting people with both asymptomatic and paralytic polio.
Oh, but wait! Gates and his scientific stable of paid sycophants aren’t stupid - they would have an answer for that! One might foresee the day when he will convince the WHO and organizations like GAVI [Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization] to go with mRNA or other non-live attenuated viral vaccines for polio.
In fact, clinicaltrials.gov lists 289 trials when the search criteria for “polio RNA vaccine” are used. Now, many of these are other novel vaccines (not RNA-based), but one must wonder how many of these clinical trials are either funded by companies in which Bill Gates holds significant shares or by the BMGF?
One has to wonder… is this really about polio?
Finally, the truth is that the WHO no longer represents its member states, and needs to be relegated to the dustbin of history. From 1948 to the 1970s, the WHO was fully funded by member states.
Then, from the 1990s to the 2000s, they started accepting contributions from private foundations, NGOs and Pharma. I have direct experience with a client developing an Ebola vaccine being subjected to a shakedown for donations by the then Director of the WHO. The WHO is deeply and notoriously corrupt.
By the 2010s, over 80% of the World Health Organization's budget was funded through voluntary contributions, with a large portion allocated to specific programs.
The list of WHO’s voluntary supporters has grown to include pharmaceutical companies, philanthropic foundations, and NGO groups such as the Gates Foundation, GAVI, PATH, and the Wellcome Trust. [a Big Pharma foundation—JWB]
In 2016, WHO established the WHO Foundation, a separate fundraising organization explicitly created to accept donations from corporations and wealthy individuals, formalizing what had previously been ad hoc private donations. This foundation can now receive contributions from entities that WHO itself could not directly accept due to conflict-of-interest policies.
This is unacceptable, and it is high time that other nations joined the USA in withdrawing from the WHO, as it has become riddled with conflicts of interest.
The image of a phoenix, rising out of the ashes of the old, comes to mind. The world must evolve and leave the past behind. Global health needs a new face, with bilateral agreements being front and center of that effort. END QUOTE
Readers can subscribe (free or paid versions) to Dr. Malone’s Substack columns here.
~END~
