Mystery Babylon and the Stone Kingdom, part 86—1776: Stone Kingdom-USA vs. Mystery Babylon-cabal-Illuminati
Previously, we published the entire chapter of Genesis 27 because of its overarching importance stretching over millennia in its fulfillment. We must become thoroughly acquainted with it.
We now pick up from my last statement in the previous installment in which I pointed out that some people who understand the true identity of Israel today come to believe what is called the “dual seed-line” doctrine. I am not among them. The duel seed-line refers to the idea that the devil is supposedly the literal father of Cain and others, including Ham and/or Canaan, and Esau.
It is not my purpose to go into all of that here, only to point out that that belief by some exists. Because, as we were reading this passage, the means to disprove it in Esau’s case is right before our eyes.
You will notice that twice in verse 1 and again in verse 5, there are three times there where Esau is referred to as the son of Isaac. To believe that a devil somehow cohabited with Rebekah and implanted physical seed in her womb so that one of the twins was satan’s son is beyond belief. Why?
Because one would have to call the Holy Spirit a liar and/or that both Isaac and Rebekah were deceived all their lives in thinking Esau was Isaac’s son. I simply believe what it says, that Esau was Isaac’s son.
Now moving away from that arcane doctrine, we find in verse 36 that Esau tells his father, Isaac, that Jacob “... took away my birthright; and behold, now he hath taken away my blessing.”
The Hebrew word translated “took away” means just that. In my understanding, it is not synonymous with theft although that is the impression many readers get. Jacob did “take away” the birthright because it was Jacob’s after Esau legally sold it to him.
Then later, Jacob, in following his mother’s instruction, did take away the blessing also. In other words, as God had predetermined, Rebekah saw to it that Jacob actually received the birthright via the legal conveyance ceremony called “the blessing.”
Even though Jacob had purchased the birthright, it would have meant nothing if Isaac had proceeded to conveyed it to Esau anyhow through the blessing ceremony. Then indeed, that would have been theft on Esau’s part because he had previously legally sold it to Jacob.
I am not saying that Jacob and Rebekah’s deception was moral and right. I am just explaining the legalities and the difference between the birthright itself and the blessing ceremony which legally conveyed the birthright.
We must also understand that the birthright refers to the great covenant promises of God to Abraham and to a specific line of his descendants and that promise included rulership of the world (under Christ). The blessing, on the other hand, is the ceremony whereby that covenant promise is legally conveyed from father to son.
Isaac, of course, intended it to go to Esau, his favorite son. But when he realized he had been deceived, we notice that it could not be undone, and so when Esau wept and pleaded if he could not have a blessing also, here is what happened:
Genesis 27:39 And Isaac his father answered and said unto him, Behold, thy dwelling shall be the fatness of the earth, and of the dew of heaven from above;
Dr. E. W. Bullinger (in his Companion Bible notes) and others make a case that this should have been translated that Esau would dwell “far from” the fatness of the earth and far from the dew of heaven. That seems to make more sense historically.
We will not wade into that controversy at this time because it is immaterial to our present discussion. What is germane to our current discussion is the next verse.
40 And by thy sword shalt thou live, and shalt serve thy brother; and it shall come to pass when thou shalt have the dominion, that thou shalt break his yoke from off thy neck.
This “blessing,” as it were, was a prophecy that the Reds of Esau-Edom would be a martial people, a war-like clan. They would live by the sword. At the same time, Isaac also prophesied that the Edomites would be subservient to the Israelites. But for how long? There is no specific time clue given in this passage.
But the prophecy does state that there would eventually come a time when the Reds would break the yoke from off their necks and the Reds would have the dominion. As I believe an understanding of true history shows, the relative subservience of Edom lasted for about 3,500 years.
I am suggesting that the prophesied time of Edom throwing off the yoke began in the late 1700s and has continued and intensified to this day. We have taught in previous lectures in this series how it was at this very time in history when two other monumental changes occurred.
Number one: the decline of the power of religious Mystery Babylon (meaning, the papacy) and number two, the rise of the Stone Kingdom on the North American continent. But, because it was not yet time in God’s prophetic timetable for the fall of Mystery Babylon, something had to arise and fill the power vacuum when the papacy declined.
So in the 1770s, two major forces began to arise—in complete opposition to each other—as light is to darkness. On the one hand, the Kingdom of heaven, the Stone Kingdom, a predominantly Christian nation arose whereby men had more individual freedom than ever before in history.
For purposes of simplifying a very complex mountain of facts concerning all the players and organizations involved, I will center on one family dynasty which also arose at this time and which right up to the present day is at or near the pinnacle of Red Edom.
This Edomite supremacy now manifests as the financial arm of Mystery Babylon the Great and over the past two centuries it has gathered nearly all the nations and people of the world under its bondage. And still, its control remains largely hidden from the masses. (Since 2017, this has begun to break and 2020 shows it even more clearly!)
This family dynasty is the House of Rothschild. We know from a number of sources, but the one we cite here, for obvious reasons, is the Jewish Encyclopedia of nearly a century ago which states that Edom is found in modern Jewry.
In 1750 a Jewish goldsmith by the name of Amschel Moses Bauer opened a Counting House in Frankfurt, Germany. Over the door of his shop he hung a sign in the form of a Red Shield. He had a son born in 1743 whom he named Amschel Mayer Bauer.
The father died in 1854 and a few years later, while still in his teens, Amschel Mayer—or many of us are accustomed to saying Mayer Amschel—Bauer found employment as a clerk with the Oppenheimer bank. The young Bauer showed an uncanny knack for the lending business and was soon promoted to a junior partnership in the firm.
With the money he earned, Bauer then returned to Frankfurt and regained ownership of the business his father had started in 1750. The red shield still hung proudly over the door. Knowing its secret significance, Bauer decided to change the family name to Rothschild, the German words for “red shield.”
Rothschild had five sons and five daughters. He trained his sons in all the esoterica of money-lending so that they could become the undisputed masters of international banking. Keeping one son with him to carry on in Frankfurt, Mayer Amschel dispatched the other four to what were then the most important financial cities of Europe: to Naples, Vienna, Paris, and London.
I am running out of time for today’s lecture, so I want to use these last few minutes to quote to you from a book called Pawns in the Game. It was written by a Canadian, Royal Canadian Navy Commander William Guy Carr, in 1958.
I have had a copy in my library for decades, but you can now find the whole book online. If this kind of material is new to you, I assure you it will be eye-opening. For the sake of time I am only quoting a few passages here and there and not necessarily in order. All emphasis and words in [brackets] are mine.
[Quote] In 1773, when Mayer Rothschild was only thirty years of age, he invited twelve other wealthy and influential men to meet him in Frankfort. His purpose was to convince them that if they agreed to pool their resources they could then finance and control the World Revolutionary Movement and use it as their Manual of Action to win ultimate control of the wealth, natural resources, and man-power of the entire world.
Rothschild revealed how the English Revolution had been organized. He pointed out the mistakes and errors that had been made. ... Mayer Rothschild pointed out that the financial results obtained as the result of the English Revolution would be as nothing when compared to the financial rewards to be obtained by a French Revolution provided those present agreed to unity of purpose and put into effect his carefully thought out revolutionary plan. ...
This agreement reached, Mayer Rothschild unfolded his revolutionary plan. By clever manipulation of their combined wealth it would be possible to create such adverse economic conditions that the masses would be reduced to a state bordering on starvation by unemployment. By use of cleverly conceived propaganda it would be easy to place the blame for the adverse economic conditions on the [French] King, His Court, the Nobles, the Church, [on] Industrialists, and [on] employers.
Their paid propagandists would arouse feelings of hatred and revenge against the ruling classes by exposing all real and alleged cases of extravagance, licentious conduct, injustice, oppression, and persecution. They would also invent infamies to bring into disrepute others who might, if left alone, interfere with their over-all plans. [end quote]
You will note that this meeting occurred in 1773. Therein was proposed the French Revolution which began 16 years later in 1789, culminating in the execution of King Louis XVI and his wife, Marie Antoinette, followed by a Reign of Terror and the guillotining of many innocent people. Not surprisingly, a red flag was the symbol of the French Revolution.
One of the means Rothschild used to set this World Revolutionary Movement into motion was the founding of a secret society in 1776 called The Order of the Illuminati. Mayer Rothschild enlisted the help of a Catholic priest, Adam Weishaupt, to assemble this secret order.
Adam Weishaupt was born in 1748 in Ingolstadt in Bavaria. Born Jewish, Weishaupt was educated by the Jesuits and became a Jesuit priest. Later he became an atheist.
In 1775, when summoned by the House of Rothschild, Weishaupt immediately defected from the Jesuits and at the behest of Meyer Amschel began to organize the Illuminati. Did Rothschild know of Weishaupt’s Jewish roots? One would suspect so, given the enormously important task delegated to Weishaupt by Rothschild.
May 1st, 1776 was the date of the founding of the Order of the Illuminati, and that, dear readers, is why May Day is celebrated annually by communists and all kinds of other collectivist organizations.
I will continue with the Rothschilds, the Illuminati, and other Reds next time, but I want to leave you today with the most astounding coincidence to ponder. Of course, I use the word coincidence tongue-in-cheek because nothing is a coincidence with God.
But God told the children of Israel in His law in Leviticus, chapter 26, in four different verses there, that if they did not hearken to his commandments, statutes and judgments, that He would punish them seven times.
I do not have the time to give you all the details here, but a “time” in Bible prophecy refers to 360 years, so seven times would equal 2,520 years. Well, God’s judgment brought the Assyrian invasion and they began to take the House of Israel into captivity in 745 B.C.
2,520 years later, the seven-times punishment ended in 1776 AD and we all know how the United States of America was born on July 4th, 1776. What a coincidence! Not at all! What a Providence!
But as was just shown, also in 1776, the Rothschilds had arranged for the Order of the Illuminati to subvert and destroy all nations, and the young united States was a target from its very inception. So stay tuned for more in the next chapter as we expound upon Mystery Babylon and the Stone Kingdom, and how Edom gains the dominion.
(2021 addendum: Is it just another coincidence that Dominion voting machines are in the center of the fraudulent U.S. elections crisis?! I think not!)
(To be continued.)