Chapter 7, Section 2: Westcott & Hort’s Doctrinal Beliefs — The Atonement of Christ
Which Bible, Which Version?
Just as a reminder, since we shall be quoting on many occasions herein, all emphases and words in [brackets] are mine unless otherwise noted.
You will recall from our discussion of Dr. Constantine Tischendorf his “great” discovery of the Sinai manuscript scrolls in the trash can
Which Bible, Which Version?
In the past six chapters in the series, we have essentially been laying the foundation for the meat, the main course, of this series examining the plethora of Bible versions which flood the marketplace in America.
That foundation commenced with our discussion of the doctrine of
Chapter 6, Section 4: The Unreliability of the Sinaiticus and Vaticanus Manuscripts
Which Bible, Which Version?
We are still in the process of helping our readers become familiar with the subject of Bible manuscripts—and we are on the final segment of that. All of this is so the reader will appreciate the next chapters which detail how “certain men crept in
Chapter 6, Section 3: Sinaiticus Denies the Central Tenet of Christianity
Which Bible, Which Version?
To segue from the previous installment in this series, allow me to repeat the last sentence.
Before I close this section, which has been meant to familiarize you with Codex Aleph, I want to discuss what is perhaps one of the strongest threats to the Christian
Chapter 6, Section 2: The Woman Caught in Adultery
Which Bible, Which Version?
We left off in yesterday’s installment, with this: Consider this excerpt from The Secrets of Mount Sinai, which reveals not only James Bentley’s bias, but also reveals a very telling fact about Westcott and Hort. All emphasis mine.
QUOTE: When Westcott became bishop of
Chapter 6, Section 1: Bogus “Families” of Bible Manuscripts
Which Bible, Which Version?
Do you remember in a previous part of this series where I issued my disclaimers about the alleged “families” of manuscripts? I stated that I was only using that term for convenience sake in trying to communicate complex material to readers in a more easily understood
Chapter 6, Section 1: Bogus “Families” of Bible Manuscripts
Which Bible, Which Version?
Do you remember in a previous part of this series where I issued my disclaimers about the alleged “families” of manuscripts? I stated that I was only using that term for convenience sake in trying to communicate complex material to readers in a more easily understood
Chapter 5, Section 4: “Connie Tisch” and Codex Aleph
Which Bible? Which Version?
Or we could entitle this section: Did God leave His church with only corrupted manuscripts for 18 centuries?!
Constantin Tischendorf was a man of immense ego, and he lashed out viciously with his pen at anyone who threatened his primacy in the world of textual scholarship.
Chapter 5, Section 3: The Devious and Duplicitous Constantin Tischendorf
Which Bible? Which Version?
There are numerous other examples I could cite and continue on about how the higher critics try to discredit Yahweh’s Word, but I will let one more suffice, and then I will get back to Constantine Tischendorf.
This one is important because of the news
