Brunson Case Hands the SCOTUS Another Loaded Gun”

The U. S. Solicitor General, Elizabeth Prelogar, yesterday responded to the Brunson petition by saying the Government hereby waives its right to file a response to the petition…” [by Loy Brunson]

However, I have a serious concern. Help me out here! Can someone tell me why this document IS NOT SIGNED? I just downloaded it from what appears to be the official SCOTUS website. To verify with me, go to the SCOTUS website, scroll down to May 24 2023 and click on Main Document” hyperlink. No signature, right?

This is a legal document of the highest order and utmost gravity. If you or I forget to sign a check, an IRS 1040, or any government form; it is considered invalid. Was this done on purpose? If so, why? To further delay matters?

If, for reasons unknown to me, the lack of Ms. Prelogar’s signature is not a big deal (?!?), and if we understand the ramifications correctly, this means the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) can now come together in Conference to decide whether to proceed with hearing the Petitioner’s (Brunson’s) request to have the 350+ members (or former members) of the House and Senate, plus the current VP and Prez removed from office in one fell swoop!

In other words, if it is valid, this document is another step forward in giving the SCOTUS another figurative loaded pistol” pointed at the bad actors in the Congress, etc. Be encouraged! This isn’t over! We could be headed for one of those Divine intervention moments in history!

Here is more background information taken from Loy’s website (https://loybrunson.com/)

QUOTE: The Supreme Court of the United States under its’ imperative public importance” RULE 11 has allowed Loy Arlan Brunson to bypass the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals. The SCOTUS as of April 19, 2023 has received, filed and docketed Loy Arlan Brunson’s emergency RULE 11 PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI.

What is Rule 11: A petition for a writ of certiorari to review a case pending in a United States court of appeals, before judgment is entered in that court, will be granted only upon a showing that the case is of such Imperative Public Importance as to justify deviation from normal appellate practice and to require immediate determination in this Court.

This new Docketed case #22-1028, allows the US Solicitor General, until the 24th of May, to respond. Once the Solicitor General responds or not, either way, on or before May 24th, the court will be free to set a date for conference.

As we are heading into a new Supreme Court Conference, we need to launch a new letter campaign for this newly Docketed case # 22-1028. We need you to join us, in showing the supreme court, We The People”, are behind and in support of this case, to save our Constitution and to insure the Oath” is binding, as required by article 6 of our Constitution. END QUOTE

We encourage all our readers to view the five-minute video on Loy’s website.


Up next Loy Brunson Update—Supreme Court Could Act Today Dr. Martin Testifies to European Parliament on Covid Timeline This just in from our intrepid correspondent on the east coast. He commented: “I was aware of Dr. [David] Martin’s work on patents. I was not aware
Latest posts The Divinity of Christ, part 15 The Divinity of Christ, part 14 17-17-17 (i.e., Q cubed!) Ten Days Of Darkness and How Might It Go Have we talked about this weird “coincidence?” The Storm is Coming Juan O Savin on how the Black Swan event is commencing with financial crises in Japan The Divinity of Christ, part 13 Thunderball and No Time to Die-007 and 107 Juan O Savin discussing - Where are we now? DRAIN IT! The Divinity of Christ, part 12 Taking a stand for godly government at the state level The Divinity of Christ, part 11 The Divinity of Christ, part 10 The Divinity of Christ, part 9 The Divinity of Christ, part 8 Kash Patel – The House is too Rotten. It Must be Cleaned, Trump Can Drain the Swamp The Divinity of Christ, part 7 The Divinity of Christ, part 6 What’s on Juan’s Mind Today? Weekend Bonus - SG Anon The Divinity of Christ, part 5—The Arian Controversy, part 3 The Divinity of Christ, part 4—The Arian Controversy, part 2 Nesara / Gesara Debunked? Clarified? Devin Nunes—The Deep State Trying to Destroy TruthSocial Because it’s the People’s Voice—We Are Winning The Divinity of Christ, part 3—More on the JW’s and Introduction to the Arian Controversy The Divinity of Christ, part 2—The Jehovah’s Witnesses and Other Cults The Divinity of Christ, Chapter 1, part 1 - Orthodoxy and Heresy Some Biblical Wisdom for when People Disagree Juan O Savin Discusses Big Changes Happening. Are You Prepared? Was St. Paul a Poor Tentmaker? A 360° Sunset! …and…