|||
We posted last Tuesday, October 22nd, and with a follow-up on last Friday, October 25th, indicating our belief that President Trump is planning to do what Presidents Lincoln, Garfield, and Kennedy were unable to do; namely, to create an honest money system.
Half of the job he and the white hats face is to wrest control of our money from the hands of the international/central banksters by taking control and then dismantling the Federal Reserve System.
The other half of the banksters’ plot which needs to be abolished is the federal income tax—the IRS. To repeat from our previous blogs just a couple of key indicators, DJT has made promises of “no tax on tips,” “no tax on Social Security benefits for our seniors,” “no taxes on overtime.”
He also stated he would consider no income taxes for first responders, police and fire, military and veterans. That is a huge number of people and he fully realizes that the rest of “working” Americans will react with “Hey, what about us?”
“How about no taxes on union workers?” And then non-union workers, farmers, ranchers, miners, and people of every other occupation will join in with “What about us?”
Obviously, it has to go to everybody—no income taxes for anyone. Sure enough, in his interview with Joe Rogan this past weekend, DJT did just that! Rogan is one of the most widely watched podcasts, with the Trump interview garnering about 28 million viewers! That, according to the Washington Examiner story here.
Trump chatted for about three hours with Rogan, who initially would not interview him because he “didn’t want to help him.” Imagine Kamala Harris doing a three-hour interview with anyone, sans teleprompter and wholly unscripted. Her dwindling base of supporters would then have a meltdown supreme and go further berserk as they witness her total inability to handle even softball questions.
The Epoch Times story is headlined:
On Rogan Podcast, Trump Floats Replacing Income Tax With Sweeping Tariffs
Here are a few excerpts. QUOTE:
In his Oct. 25 appearance on “The Joe Rogan Experience” podcast, former President Donald Trump floated the idea of eliminating the income tax and substituting it with sweeping tariffs.
Host Joe Rogan asked if the Republican presidential candidate had made the suggestion, as earlier reports had indicated.
“Yeah, sure. But why not?” Trump replied.
“We will not allow the enemy to come in and take our jobs and take our factories and take our workers and take our families unless they pay a big price. And the big price is tariffs.”
He referenced President William McKinley, who served from 1897 until his assassination in 1901, as “the tariff king.”
“He spoke beautifully of tariffs,” Trump said.
McKinley was often nicknamed the “Napoleon of Protection” for his aggressive defense of high tariffs in the House of Representatives.
The Tariff Act of 1890—developed by McKinley—increased average taxes on all imports from 38 percent to 49.5 percent, intending to shield domestic manufacturing from foreign markets.
“And then, in the early 1900s, they switched over—stupidly, frankly—to an income tax. And you know why? Because countries were putting a lot of pressure on America: ‘We don’t want to pay tariffs, please don’t.’ You know they, believe me, they control our politicians.” END QUOTE {Emphasis mine}
Here is a link to the full story in the Epoch Times.
Of course, critics will scoff and assert that tariffs could never replace the lost income to the Treasury. They are correct. However, they assume it is necessary to plug the huge gap of income to the Treasury. It isn’t.
They forget the other part of Trump’s plan is to put a guy like Elon Musk or Vivek Ramaswamy in charge of shrinking the bloated federal government by 60,70, maybe 80 percent to put the servant of the people back under the restraints of the Constitution.
Trump has already promised he will abolish the [unconstitutional] federal Department of Education, and—per the 10th Amendment—leave it in the hands of the states or the people. There are many other federal bureaucracies that are wholly unconstitutional and should likewise be abolished.
Yesterday, we watched the Newsmax coverage of the remarkable rally in Madison Square Garden. Fox News, CNN and MSNBC covered it only in part and then broke away to their pundits so they could mold the opinions of their viewers.
For lack of time, we shall forego commenting any further on the rally and DJT’s speech. We wish only to point out the surprise appearance of Melania who spoke briefly.
Those who have been paying attention will recall that throughout the Trump administration and beyond, secret communications have been signaled through Melania’s wardrobe. It is the naval codes of semaphores and Melania is the mast or flagstaff.
This is the third appearance in a row (that I have seen her) where her garb is some design involving only black and white. First it was an outfit which was mostly black with specks of white, as though it were depicting a black universe with tiny stars scattered about. Darkness prevailed.
The second—if memory serves—was a white pantsuit, with a white jacket covering a black blouse, signifying the forces of good will swallow up the forces of darkness.
Her dress yesterday was almost zebra-like with what appeared to be equal amounts of black and white. This, to me, represents where we are right now in the approaching climax of the battle between the forces of light and darkness, between good and evil.
I am sure other observers can add more to my first-level impressions, but it all bespeaks of the frequent refrain in the Q posts that as this existential battle progresses, we will experience “from darkness to light.” That is interpreted spiritually as well as in terms of freedom and liberty under godly government.
END
